Wednesday, April 2, 2014

New Groundbreaking Book On Malcolm X At Oxford Union by Historian and Political Scientist Saladin Ambar


Malcolm X: Oxford Union Debate:

December 3rd, 1964:   Malcolm X speaks in Oxford Union debate titled " Extremism in the Defense of Liberty is No Vice,  Moderation in the Pursuit of Justice is No Virtue.":

   

Malcolm X at Oxford Union: Racial Politics in a Global Era by Saladin Ambar

Hardcover
$26.96


Series: Transgressing Boundaries: Studies in Black Politics and Black Communities
Hardcover: 240 pages
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA


ISBN-10: 0199975477
ISBN-13: 978-0199975471


In 1964 Malcolm X was invited to debate at the Oxford Union Society at Oxford University. The topic of debate that evening was the infamous phrase from Barry Goldwater's 1964 Republican Convention speech:"Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice; moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue." At a time when Malcolm was traveling widely and advocating on behalf of blacks in America and other nations, his thirty minute speech at the Oxford Union stands out as one of the great addresses of the civil rights era.

Delivered just months before his assassination, the speech followed a period in which Malcolm had traveled throughout Africa and much of the Muslim world. The journey broadened his political thought to encompass decolonization, the revolutions underway in the developing world, and the relationship between American blacks and non-white populations across the globe-including England.

Facing off against debaters in one of world's most elite institutions, he delivered a revolutionary message that tackled a staggering array of issues: the nature of national identity; US foreign policy in the developing world; racial politics at home; the experiences of black immigrants in England; and the nature of power in the contemporary world. It represents a moment when his thought had advanced to its furthest point, shedding the parochial concerns of previous years for an increasingly global and humanist approach to ushering in social change.

Set to publish near the fiftieth anniversary of his death, Malcolm X at Oxford Union will reshape our understanding not only of the man himself, but world politics both then and now.


Malcolm X at Oxford Union


Racial Politics in a Global Era

Saladin Ambar

Transgressing Boundaries: Studies in Black Politics and Black Communities

The first book to place the Oxford Address in the canon of great civil rights speeches of the 20th Century

Makes the case that Malcolm X was seeking to organize a black human rights movement not only in America, the Middle East, or Africa, but in cities such as Paris, London, and Amsterdam as well

Shows Malcolm X moving beyond Black Nationalism, while at the same time rejecting the notion of 'color-blindness'

Makes the case that the racial, religious, and political difficulties associated with immigration in both Europe and the United States today owe their origins to the time of Malcolm X's address; and some of the more difficult solutions to those challenges can be found in that speech at Oxford
SALADIN AMBAR

Biography


Saladin Ambar writes and teaches about American politics and society at Lehigh University in Bethlehem, PA. He is the author of Malcolm X at Oxford Union: Racial Politics in a Global Era (Oxford University Press) and How Governors Built the Modern American Presidency (University of Pennsylvania Press). His first work of historical fiction ("The Frenchman and the Stranger") has just appeared in Seattle's Monarch Review. He is currently researching for a book on the political life and thought of former New York Governor, Mario Cuomo. All other times he is the father of 6 year-old triplets, who are fairly disinterested in all of the above.

You can follow his blog on the Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/saladin-ambar/



 

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

'The Divide': An Important New Book By Leading Political Journalist And Social Critic Matt Taibbi

MATT TAIBBI

The Divide: American Injustice in the Age of the Wealth Gap
by Matt Taibbi
Hardcover: 448 pages
Spiegel & Grau.  Released on April 8, 2014

All,

As I've been saying for nearly a decade now: Matt Taibbi is the best damn political journalist in this country and one of the best in the world. He, Paul Krugman, and Frank Rich are three of the very few writers on U.S. political economy today who not only speak real truth to real power all the time but have the knowledge, courage, integrity, and CLARITY to say exactly what needs to be said no matter what anyone else thinks. Born in 1970 Taibbi is that super rare throwback to a time when even this country had a stable of real public intellectuals who were also progressive 'social and economic justice advocates' in the genuine sense of this rapidly evaporating phrase...

Kofi

PLEASE NOTE: Mr. Taibbi will be appearing and speaking live at the First Congregational Church 2345 Channing Way Berkeley, California on April 12, 2014 at 7:30PM.

Please Attend-- I guarantee you won't regret it...



Monday, March 31, 2014

The Ongoing Crises Facing Latino Americans And The Abject Failure Of The U.S. Government To Support and Protect Them


Lizeth Chacon of Aurora, Colo., who signs up Latinos to vote, reports growing disinterest in registration. Credit Matthew Staver for The New York Times
 
All,

This article underscores the abject failure of the Obama administration in general to properly engage and vociferously FIGHT the proto-fascist right in Congress and beyond on a strictly partisan national level since 2009. This massive strategic, tactical and ideological blunder on the part of not only the White House but the entire hopelessly neoliberal Democratic Party over the past five years is a political disgrace and we are all going to suffer mightily for it even more after the November 2014 midterm elections which are--let's face it--going to be a national disaster and will ensure that Obama--one of the weakest political leaders in recent historical memory--will remain a defeated lame duck President for the last two years of his second term in office. The really sick aspect of this gigantic failure is that we--meaning what shamelessly passes for 'the left' in American politics (both in and out of power in Washington) have far too often been complicit in foolishly giving the 'first black President' a pass instead of engaging in an organized and disciplined struggle/movement nationally that would seriously address and oppose both the neoliberal Democrats and the virulently rightwing Republicans/Tea Party. Now I'm deeply afraid we have lost/squandered our truly historical opportunity to change the trajectory of this country in a progressive direction and that the WORSE is certainly yet to come. I shudder when I think that in all probability the utterly rancid "choices" in 2016 are going to be Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush (yeah ANOTHER ONE). Folks, we are in deep, deep trouble (much deeper I think than anyone could have rationally predicted even a year ago) and I fear that the real madmen in this country are on the verge of taking over in much the same way that the Nazis took over the liberal government in Germany and defeated the smug, myopic, corrupt, and hubris filled Weimar Republic in 1933 without having to fire a shot (until a few years later that is when this new fascist government made the even more insane move to conquer the globe). Yeah it's just that frightening to me and I think anyone who has thought about it for more than a few seconds would readily and depressingly concur. The stark fulfillment of "NATAMBU'S LAW" is a horrific prospect and I seriously hope that I'm dead wrong about all this...but I doubt it....Stay tuned...

Kofi

P.S. For the uninitiated NATAMBU'S LAW states the following: "No matter how bad things are or appear to be one can rest assured upon further investigation that in reality things are far worse than anything you could possibly imagine."

Hopes Frustrated, Many Latinos Reject the Ballot Box Altogether
By JACKIE CALMES
MARCH 30, 2014
New York Times


AURORA, Colo. — As the weather warms, Lizeth Chacon is anticipating a new season of registering Latino voters — yet dreading experiences like one late last year, when she came upon a skate park full of older teenagers.

“I thought, ‘The perfect age! They’re turning 18,’ ” said Ms. Chacon, just 26 herself, born in Mexico and now the lead organizer at Rights for All People, a local immigrant organizing group. But among the roughly 50 people she approached in this increasingly diverse city east of Denver, “not a single person” was interested in her pitch, including those already old enough to vote: “They were like, ‘Why? Why would I bother to vote?’ ”

Across the country, immigrant-rights advocates report mounting disillusionment with both parties among Latinos, enough to threaten recent gains in voting participation that have reshaped politics to Democrats’ advantage nationally, and in states like Colorado with significant Latino populations. High hopes — kindled by President Obama’s elections and stoked in June by Senate passage of the most significant overhaul of immigration law in a generation, with a path to citizenship for about 11 million people here unlawfully — have been all but dashed.

Latinos mainly blame Republicans, who control the House and have buried the Senate bill, but they also have soured on Mr. Obama. The federal government has so aggressively enforced existing immigration laws that one national Hispanic leader recently nicknamed the president “deporter in chief” for allowing nearly two million people to be deported.

A day after that widely reported gibe in Washington, at Denver’s Spanish-language radio station KBNO (“Que Bueno” to its audience), the host Fernando Sergio devoted his three-hour talk show to asking listeners whether they agreed with the criticism, or “has President Obama done the best he can against Republican opposition?”

“The majority were very angry at the president,” Mr. Sergio said in an interview at the station, where pictures of John and Robert Kennedy, Bill Clinton and Mr. Obama hang on the walls. “People feel like he’s made some promises that he hasn’t fulfilled, that he can do more” — like expand his 2012 order that deferred deportations of young people brought to the country as children, a group known as Dreamers.

“If I were a Democratic consultant,” Mr. Sergio added, “I would have been concerned.”

Democrats indeed are worried. While the growing Latino electorate is a force in presidential elections, and one expected to give Democrats an edge for years unless Republicans shed an anti-immigrant image, Latinos are relative bit players in this midterm election year. Their turnout typically drops in midterm years; nationally and in Colorado, about half of registered Latinos voted in 2008 and 2012, but less than a third did in the 2010 midterm elections and many Democrats lost. This fall, with many Latinos caught between hostility toward Republicans and disappointment with Mr. Obama, participation could dip further.

“There’s a sense from some people that there’s nowhere to turn, and I’m afraid they’re just going to be frozen in frustration,” said Lisa Duran, executive director of Rights for All People, and Ms. Chacon’s supervisor. “It’s absolutely imperative that we not let that happen.”

A depressed vote threatens Democrats in a number of races, notably in Colorado, where Latinos were 14 percent of the state’s 2012 electorate and about 70 percent voted for Democrats. Their Senate majority at risk, Democrats are hustling to help Senator Mark Udall now that a formidable Republican, Representative Cory Gardner, has challenged him. They also hope to snatch the House district, including Aurora, from Representative Mike Coffman, a Republican. His Democratic rival is Andrew Romanoff, a former State House speaker.

While Mr. Coffman lately has moderated his stance on immigration, Mr. Gardner has not. He has opposed the deportation stay for young people and objects to the Senate’s path to citizenship as amnesty, and Democrats plan to emphasize that to Latino voters.


Voter Participation:

Hispanics have typically had lower rates of voter turnout than whites and blacks, and frustration with Republicans and President Obama alike could cause rates to dip even further in this fall’s midterm elections.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey
Note: Comparable data for Asian voters and voters of other races is not available.

“This is a turnout election for Democrats, and we’re shifting focus and resources because we know that,” said Senator Michael Bennet of Colorado, chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. “We can’t outcompete the billionaires on the airwaves. It’s going to have to be a ground game.” Mr. Bennet won in 2010 by mobilizing more Latinos, women and young voters than many in either party predicted.

Discouraged Democrats take some comfort that the closest Senate races are mostly in states without many Latinos. As for the House, a couple of dozen races could turn on Latino votes — including in California, Florida, Nevada and Texas — but Republicans are expected to retain their majority.

Still, Mr. Obama wants to reconcile with Latinos, a group that gave him 71 percent of its votes in 2012. He recently met with several Hispanic lawmakers and days later with 17 leaders of immigration groups, but the meetings only underscored each side’s frustration with the other.

In the meeting with the immigration groups, Mr. Obama did most of the talking for nearly two hours, participants said. He argued that by being united, they had they won public support for immigration changes, passed the Senate bill and put House Republicans on the defensive. By now attacking him, the president said — and he chided Janet Murguia, president of the National Council of La Raza, for her “deporter in chief” taunt — the activists were relieving the pressure on Republicans, he said. Privately, Republicans agree.

The president told them that his secretary of homeland security, Jeh Johnson, would review the deportation system. But Mr. Obama lowered expectations by reiterating that administration lawyers say he cannot take action beyond his 2012 order benefiting the so-called Dreamers. The advocates expressed skepticism.

The exchange reflected Mr. Obama’s bind: If he suspends more deportations, he could mend relations with Latinos and perhaps motivate more of them to vote. But he could lose what chance remains for new immigration law, his second-term domestic priority, since House Republicans have signaled they would cite such executive action as proof that he cannot be trusted to enforce any law.

Back in Colorado, Leticia Zavala follows the Washington maneuvering from the vast eastern plains, in the ranching center of Fort Morgan where she was born, in what is now Mr. Gardner’s House district. The county is one-third Latino, and her experiences there capture the community’s conflicted feelings.

Ms. Zavala, 26, recently was packing to drive to Mexico with her two young children for their first visit with her husband since he was deported in December, more than two years after he was snared in an immigration raid at a dairy plant, and six years after he began seeking legal status. While she knows perhaps 10 people who have been deported, until her husband’s ordeal, “I didn’t really know how it affected families,” she said, wiping tears.

Yet she has become more politically active, not less. Ms. Zavala takes heart from Latinos’ legislative victories in Colorado. She formed a small immigrants assistance group, enrolled in community college, and helps a local lawyer with citizenship classes. Everywhere, she carries a backpack with voter registration forms, envelopes and stamps.

Ms. Zavala estimated that she has helped register about 100 people, though it has not been easy. “Many people are angry and upset because Obama promised so much and it’s been how many years?” she said. “But the Republicans aren’t doing anything. We have something; there’s a bill. And for us to sit here in March 2014 with nothing — people are just really upset.”